You are currently browsing the tag archive for the 'Race relations' tag.

It was all over the news here today: The Solicitor General has declined NZ Police permission to prosecute the group of arrested individuals under the relatively new Suppression of Terrorism Act. This was a major blow for the New Zealand Police as they have had a lot of negative publicity and scandals over the last couple of years. However, Police Commissioner Howard Broad seems to have taken the decision with professionalism and grace, accepting that there were some elements of the operation in Ruatoki (the settlement closest to where the supposed Military-style training camps were ensconced) that he finds regrettable, talking about the need for the rebuilding of relationships between the police and affected communities.

It’s interesting to me how everyone reacts to these types of issues. I just had a brief argument with my flatmate over the emotiveness of Pita Sharples (Maori Party co-leader, and a strong critic of the whole operation) when his opinion was sought on the current events show Campbell Live. Sharples has a very melodramatic style that really gets on my nerves. The thing is, I might have been more sympathetic with the substance of his comments had they been made with a little less of the hyperbole in which he seems to often indulge. A couple of weeks earlier he had famously claimed that race relations in this country had been “set back 100 years” by the actions of police, and on this occasion he used language like “police ninjas” and “gung ho” and all the rest. Just not necessary, in my view. But my flatmate, who knows a few of those arrested, is very much against the case, and was agreeing wholeheartedly with Sharples. A brief but uncharacteristically heated exchange followed between us; let’s just say that we disagreed over the significance on how something is said, over what is said. It left me wondering what it is that we are reacting to when we can become polarised so easily even when many of the facts are not in dispute.